Sandbagged!

Sandbagged!
Photograph by Steve Barnett

Saturday, 16 June 2012

A really inconvenient truth!

There is a weed.  A really weedy weed that has stalks as weak as juliennes of cooked carrot.  Bend it and it snaps.  It has no thorns or stings to protect it.  It is only an annual so dies every winter.  It is easily pulled from the ground due to it only putting down shallow roots.  In Great Britain, it is a foreigner, thousands of miles from home, so it is out of its natural habitat.  Yet it is going to wipe out our rivers' populations of native, riparian plants and by so doing kill millions of baby trout every winter unless something is done to prevent it.

What is this weed?  If it is so weak, how can it possibly do so much harm?

It is Himalayan Balsam.  An inconvenient truth is that it has been brought to these shores and allowed to spread into the wild.  Another is that it makes an abundance of seed that will grow in almost any substrate in the most unpromising conditions. 

This example is growing in a tiny pocket of mossy loam on the side of a tree.

It sows its own seed by firing them off with almost the same range as a Diana BB gun.  Flinging seeds across a road, to find new ground to grow in, is no problem to the Himalayan Balsam. 


On this side of a road here is a plant growing in a salt pile.  The salt is placed there because modern cars and modern motorists can't drive properly in the snow.  This plant actually seems to be doing very well on its saline base.  Across the road there are already some seedlings taking hold...

How can such a weedy thing do harm?

It does it by the exuberance of its seed, it's speed at growing above the native plants, the shading of its leaves kills the natives through lack of light and then, come winter, it dies and leaves the earth bare for its seeds to take over more easily.  By dying away and leaving bare soil to be washed into the rivers and streams where it blinds the gravel and suffocates the trout eggs.

What is the remedy?  There are two remedies, one immediate and very effective, the other needs money before we can have it and clear this alien invasive from our shores once and for all.

The immediate remedy is to pull it out of the ground and leave it to die as its roots dry out.  This anyone can do and any angler will find pulling 100 plants is a quick and easy task of only a few minutes.  The time to pull it is right now before it has chance to flower and send its seeds pinging out all around it to maintain its invasion.  Get all the plants out and the following year there will be fewer plants to pull up as the seed will be at least a year old. The year after that there will be even fewer.  Keep this up for five years, the plant is gone and the native plants will re-establish themselves and the bare soil will be covered and protected by roots.  Erosion of the soil will be reduced.  The trout eggs will no longer be killed by suffocation.

The other, permanent remedy does not exist yet.  This needs the chemical industry to develop a selective weedkiller that kills Himalayan Balsam and nothing else.  This would cost a lot, millions probably.  Where should the money come from?  Well anglers for a start.  It's no good expecting anyone else to do it for us.  They won't.  The Environment Agency position is "It's endemic now.  There is nothing to be done about it!"  Wildlife Trusts often have a similar position, sometimes even worse with the silly, "Well the bees like the flowers..." remark, as if native plants are anathema to bees!  Unfortunately the bees tend to bypass native plants to get to the extra sugar content of the Himalayan Balsam flowers and the natives suffer even more.  Maybe if the good folk at the RSPB realised that Himalayan Balsam has a negative effect on native birdlife some money might be made available from its massive reserves?  You can see why the ideal solution will probably never exist.

This carpet of Himalayan Balsam has crowded out all the natives except for a few Red Campion and the hardwood shrubs.  (Though for me the Rhododendron in the foreground can come out and be burned as an alien too!)
Now here's the rub.  The second remedy won't exist and the first remedy may as well not exist.  With a very few, very notable, exceptions, anglers will not pull up 100 plants apiece every time they go-a-fishing.  They expect someone else to do it and anyway most anglers don't care about the presence of Himalayan Balsam!  Why is that?  Well it's for the very same reason they don't join the Angling Trust, the same reason they don't remove litter, the same reason they don't write to their MPs to get bad hydro-power stopped immediately, the same reason they don't report pollution the instant they see it

It's because it doesn't immediately help them catch more fish!

NOW THAT IS A REALLY INCONVENIENT TRUTH!



Regular Rod







9 comments:

  1. I'd rather see blue bells and campion than only HB as in the last picture. Good post RR; bang on.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. A bit of grass would be better than bare soil...

      Regular Rod

      Delete
  2. The EA, in a document they title ' EA wages war on invasive wildlife' say;
    'The Environment Agency and other partners support a variety of volunteer groups who remove this invasive plant by hand from waterways'.

    So it's down to anglers or anglers to pay keepers and they it's up to keepers, no one else.

    http://www.environment-agency.gov.uk/news/132163.aspx?page=6&month=8&year=2011

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. ...and with very few, very notable exceptions the anglers will do nowt because they don't see how it can help them immediately catch more fish.

      A glimmer of hope is that the work being done by you, the Monnow group, SPRITE and now even the PAAS (bless them) is setting examples all over that prove it can be beaten and without it costing millions too. Maybe there will be others to take up the challenge too?

      I'd love to be proven wrong about my uncomplimentary views...


      Regular Rod

      Delete
  3. It is undoubtably a major problem, but it is a solvable one. A combination of spraying and pulling works and doesn't cost millions. Take a look at www.monnow.org It's amazing how quickly the indigenous flora returns.

    Neil

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Hi Neil you are quite right. The Monnow Group is one of those very few, very notable, exceptions...

      Regular Rod

      Delete
    2. Congrats to Rob Denny and his pals and rods.

      Delete
    3. It is not too difficult. Himalayan Balsam has a seed life of only years. Whatevere you do, once you start; keep going back 2 or 3 times to pull what regrows or germiates late, to ensure none goes to seed. By a combination of initial spraying, cutting or hand pulling and then follow up hand pulling we have eradicated HB from over 30kms of river in 3 years and are well on the way to eradicating it from another 50kms in another 1 to 2 years.

      The KEY is to keep going back to pick regrowth, once you start.

      Well done to Warren, David, Stephen and Christopher for eradicating it from the Derbyshire Wye catchment.

      If anybody wants more advice email me on robert.denny@virgin.net.

      It can be done - make a start!!

      Delete
  4. It seems to be nature at work, not just in your country, but all over. Here in the states were fighting something or other all the time. As usual, it's up to the people who use the waterways to implement a workable solution. Thanks for the interesting post Rod!

    ReplyDelete